27
edits
Difference between revisions of "Afflictions"
m
no edit summary
m |
m |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' | '''[http://forums.imperian.com/discussion/comment/30347/#Comment_30347 Brief discussion from Imperian forums] that shows how curing "pools" work (and why your [[Curing|autocuring affliction priorities]] are only part of the picture):''' | ||
'''Asker:''' "Why is laurel curing hellsight first when madness is priority 1 for me"? | '''Asker:''' "Why is laurel curing hellsight first when madness is priority 1 for me"? | ||
'''Wysrias:''' "Your priorities don't determine what affliction is actually cured. Laurel can cure both madness and hellsight, and hellsight is not a madness affliction, so both can be cured by that action". | '''Wysrias:''' "Your priorities don't determine what affliction is actually cured. Laurel can cure both madness and hellsight, and hellsight is not a madness affliction, so both can be cured by that action". | ||
'''Asker:''' "So basically it was a 50/50 shot at hellsight/madness"? | '''Asker:''' "So basically it was a 50/50 shot at hellsight/madness"? | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
As a side note, this is one of the major sources of complexity in affliction tracking - you have to make a lot of 'educated guesses' about what afflictions are actually being cured off of your target, and rely on a combination of context clues (they ate kelp and immediately smoked a pipe - bet they cured asthma) and sheer luck to be as accurate as possible". | As a side note, this is one of the major sources of complexity in affliction tracking - you have to make a lot of 'educated guesses' about what afflictions are actually being cured off of your target, and rely on a combination of context clues (they ate kelp and immediately smoked a pipe - bet they cured asthma) and sheer luck to be as accurate as possible". | ||