Difference between revisions of "Afflictions"

4 bytes removed ,  09:11, 24 July 2015
m
no edit summary
m
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Brief discussion from forums on how affliction "pools" interact with cures (and why your [[Curing|autocuring affliction priorities]] are only part of the picture)''' (http://forums.imperian.com/discussion/comment/30347/#Comment_30347):
'''[http://forums.imperian.com/discussion/comment/30347/#Comment_30347 Brief discussion from Imperian forums] that shows how curing "pools" work (and why your [[Curing|autocuring affliction priorities]] are only part of the picture):'''


'''Asker:'''  "Why is laurel curing hellsight first when madness is priority 1 for me"?
'''Asker:'''  "Why is laurel curing hellsight first when madness is priority 1 for me"?
Line 12: Line 12:


As a side note, this is one of the major sources of complexity in affliction tracking - you have to make a lot of 'educated guesses' about what afflictions are actually being cured off of your target, and rely on a combination of context clues (they ate kelp and immediately smoked a pipe - bet they cured asthma) and sheer luck to be as accurate as possible".
As a side note, this is one of the major sources of complexity in affliction tracking - you have to make a lot of 'educated guesses' about what afflictions are actually being cured off of your target, and rely on a combination of context clues (they ate kelp and immediately smoked a pipe - bet they cured asthma) and sheer luck to be as accurate as possible".




27

edits